Sunday, September 13, 2026

Sed Festival may have been inaugurated by Den-Djoser

 



by

 Damien F. Mackey

 

 

“The Sed Festival’s earliest documented celebrations date back to the First Dynasty, during the reign of King Den. Evidence such as inscriptions and objects indicate that Den partook in this festival to symbolize his continued dominion over Egypt. These early iterations of the festival focused on the pharaoh’s physical endurance and ability to perform ritualistic acts, reflecting his divine fitness to rule”.

 

World History Edu

 

 

Introduction

 

When we recognise that Den (or Udimu) - whose beginning of reign is conventionally dated to c. 2970 BC - was the biblical patriarch, Joseph of Egypt (closer to 1770 BC), then we have an illuminating context in ancient Egypt (Years of Plenty, then Famine) for the Heb (Festival) Sed that may first have taken place during his time of great fame.

 

The names of Den spell out precisely who he was. I set these out in e.g. my article:

 

Jacob and Joseph, Step Pyramid, Famine

 

(1) Jacob and Joseph, Step Pyramid, Famine

 

Den’s alternative names

 

There are various compelling reasons why I am now convinced that Joseph in Egypt was Den, not least of these being his other name, as given by Manetho, Usaph-ais.

This, Usaph, is purely the Semitic name for Joseph (Yosef, Yusef) with a Greek

ending.

 

But that is not all.

 

Den also had the hypocoristic nick-name, Khasti, “foreigner”, which is exactly how the Egyptians would have viewed the Hebrew Joseph, whose brothers would require an interpreter (Genesis 42:23).

If all that were not enough, the name Den is interpreted as meaning “bringer of water”, or “pourer of water”, which is precisely what Joseph did for a parched Egypt.

 

Summing up the names of Den, then, we arrive at this happy combination:

 

Usaph (Joseph);

the foreigner;

he who brings water.

….

 

And bringing water to what was to become a parched Egypt during the protracted Famine Joseph did in abundance, with those vast, temporary dams, and waterways (Joseph’s Canal), at a time when even Egypt’s important lake dried up:

 

Old Kingdom Egypt Famine, even Lake Faiyum dried up

 

(1)  Old Kingdom Egypt Famine, even Lake Faiyum dried up

It must be amongst the greatest wonders of history that a Pharaoh would, on the basis of Joseph’s God-given ability to interpret dreams, allow this most charismatic official of his to proceed with the massive (Old Kingdom) infrastructural program that archaeology has revealed at this time in anticipation of a purported great Famine years into the future!

My suspicion is that Joseph’s Pharaoh may have been somewhat younger than the “Joseph [who] was thirty years old when he stood before Pharaoh King of Egypt” (Genesis 41:46). That the possibly young Pharaoh may even have been assisted in his rulership by his mother – although there is no indication of that in the Genesis account.

 

I tentatively suggest that Pharaoh’s mother was the influential Merneith.

Merneith - Wikipedia

“Merneith is linked with the kings DjerDjet, and Den in a variety of seal impressions and inscribed bowls”.

 

The possibly young Pharaoh, whose troubling Dreams (cf. Genesis 41:1, 5) Joseph had satisfactorily explained for him, may have been totally in awe of the persuasive foreigner standing before him who had not been shy about advertising his own dreams.

 

Although making Joseph his second, the Pharaoh appears, in effect, to have handed over power almost entirely to the Hebrew sage (Genesis 41:44): “Then Pharaoh said to Joseph, ‘I am Pharaoh, but without your word no one will lift hand or foot in all Egypt’.”

 

Joseph, an honourable and God-fearing man of faith, may have been, as a son of Jacob, something of a wheeler-dealer, and possibly far too astute for the Pharaoh.

 

Who was this early Pharaoh?

 

If Den was Joseph, as already argued, then who was Djer, who was Djet?

 

There is an easy answer to this – although it also necessitates a vastly wide-sweeping revolution in Egyptian historical revision.

 

Put simply, to begin with, Djer was Djet, appropriately a Famine pharaoh:

 

Taking a Djet to Djoser’s Famine

 

(3) Taking a Djet to Djoser's Famine

 

Manetho mentions that in [Djet’s] reign a great famine seized Egypt”.

Djet - Wikipedia

 

This was the same great Famine as occurred at the time of Joseph (Den/Udimu), and was the same as the seven-year Famine at the time of the Third Dynasty Pharaoh, Horus Netjerikhet, who was Djer (= Netjerikhet), my presumed Pharaoh of Den.

And Djer may also re-emerge in the so-called Second Dynasty’s Nynetjer (Ninetjer), whose reign suffered a phase of “poor harvests” (Ancient Egypt Online, “Nynetjer”).

 

Joseph was also, as various researchers have come to realise, the brilliant sage, Imhotep, serving under Horus Netjerikhet.

This Pharaoh is generally identified with Djoser (Zoser) of the Famine era.

 

But Djoser was actually, again, the biblical Joseph:

 

Imhotep Enigma, his pharaoh was not Djoser, and proof for Egypt’s Third Dynasty Famine

 

(5) Imhotep Enigma, his pharaoh was not Djoser, and proof for Egypt’s Third Dynasty Famine

 

Was this the original ‘Famine Stela’?

 

(6) Was this the original 'Famine Stela'?

 

We find this Djoser in yet another of the patriarch Joseph’s (many) manifestations, now as the Third Dynasty’s, Sekhemkhet, whose nomen was Djoser-ti.

Egyptian Pharaohs : Old Kingdom : Dynasty 3 : Sekhemkhet

 

Now, regarding Djer as Djet, we must really stretch pharaonic history by further identifying the famine Pharaoh, Horus Netjerikhet (= Djer), with the powerful, unifying ruler, Horus Netjerihedjet (Mentuhotep II) of Egypt’s Eleventh Dynasty, again a famine era. In the name, Netjerihedjet, we find our sought-for element, Djet.

 

And, so, there we have it (Table 1):

 

First Dynasty (Famine), Djer = Djet;

Third Dynasty (Famine), Horus Netjerikhet (= Djer);

Eleventh Dynasty (Famine), Horus Netjerihedjet (= Djet).

 

Correspondingly, Joseph was (Table 2):

 

First Dynasty (Famine), Den (Udimu);

Third Dynasty (Famine), Imhotep = Sekhemkhet Djoser-ti;

 

And Joseph was, as I have explained in other articles, much more even than this.

E.g., Joseph may have been, as well, the somewhat boastful Ankhtifi (hypocoristicon, inverted, of Joseph’s given Egyptian name, Zaphenath-paneah, Genesis 41:45):

 

Egypt’s high official, Ankhtifi, outboasts even great Senenmut

 

(8) Egypt’s high official, Ankhtifi, outboasts even great Senenmut

 

Ankhtifi a Joseph type saving Egypt in an extensive Famine

 

(8) Ankhtifi a Joseph type saving Egypt in an extensive Famine

 

Ankhtifi of ancient Egypt substituting for the king

 

(8) Ankhtifi of ancient Egypt substituting for the king

 

 

Correlating Heb Sed (b-sd)

 

This overall arrangement as entabulated above (Table 1 and Table 2) now enables us to tidy up the Festival Sed, inaugurated during the First Dynasty, but most prominent as well in the (so-called) Third Dynasty.

 

First Den, and then Djoser, performed the Heb Sed ritual.

 

These two names are thought to represent two separate pharaohs, but both names belonged to, as already explained, Joseph – a quasi-Pharaoh.

 

Here is Djoser again:

Sed Festival in Ancient Egypt - World History Edu

Pharaoh Djoser of the Third Dynasty further institutionalized the Sed Festival. His mortuary complex at Saqqara, including the boundary stones in the Heb Sed court, reflects how the festival became intertwined with notions of eternal kingship. Depictions of Djoser performing the Heb Sed in the false doorway of his pyramid highlight the belief that the king could carry out the ceremony perpetually in the afterlife, ensuring his eternal authority”.

 

And the Eleventh Dynasty appropriately had a Heb Sed festival during the reign of Horus Netjerihedjet (= Djet).

 

Heb Sed elements

 

Whatever the Heb Sed meant overall for the ancient Egyptians – and I do not claim to be an expert on it – there are, I find, key elements associated with it that appear to have been drawn from the amazing life of Joseph’s father, the patriarch Jacob.

 

Visually outstanding is the Step Pyramid of Saqqara, what I have previously called ‘a material icon of Jacob’s dream of a stairway [sullām סֻלָּם֙] to heaven’ (Genesis 28:12) - especially considering Egyptologist Joyce Tyldesley’s description of the pyramids of Egypt as astral “stairways” (emphasis added):

 

“The Old Kingdom pharaohs believed that death was the beginning

of eternal life. To help them on their way they built pyramids;

huge ramps or stairwaysleading directly to the sky”.

 

Pyramids: The Real Story Behind Egypt’s Most Ancient Monuments (2023).

 

Saqqara seems to have been the geographical locus for the Third Dynasty’s Heb Sed.

 

Then there is the Pharaoh’s wrestling with a young man.

 

“So Jacob was left alone, and a man wrestled with him till daybreak” (Genesis 32:24).

 

Wrestling with a young man was also a feature of the ancient Egyptian Heb-Sed festival, as is apparent from the case of Djoser (Zoser), builder of the Step Pyramid, which I have held to be a ‘material icon’ of Jacob’s dream of a Stairway to Heaven.

https://books.google.com.au/books?id=wLUjtPDyu-

“Celebrating the rejuvenation of the king's powers every 30 years, the heb-sed festival was a demonstration of a king's strength and prowess. During the festival the king ran around a heb-sed court performing feats of strength to demonstrate his ability to continue to rule Egypt. In doing so he experienced rebirth, maintaining his position as a god on Earth.

The heb-sed court of King Zoser at Saqqara is a long rectangular open court where the king performed the heb-sed ritual, part of which was to wrestle with a young man in order to prove he was strong enough to continue ruling Egypt.

 

A limestone relief in a chamber under the Step Pyramid shows King Zoser during his heb-sed festival running between the markers representing Upper and Lower Egypt. On the east and west sides of the open courtyard are several symbolic chapels—the interiors were filled with rubble—and only the platforms in front of the chapel were used. Statues of the king and the gods were placed in niches along the wall, and the platforms may have been used for ceremonies during the festival. …”.

 

This wrestling with a young man might add a whole new dimension, a spiritual one, to the Heb Sed. Jacob’s encounter with the heavenly being really marked the beginning of Israel, when the young man changed Jacob’s name to Israel, ‘because you have struggled with God and with humans and have overcome’ (Genesis 32:28).

It may explain the rigours of the Heb Sed, a human struggle with the Divine, to prove one’s fitness to rule or govern:

The Heb-Sed Festival - Egypt Museum

“The Heb-Sed (also rendered as the Sed Festival or b-sd) was among the most ancient and significant royal ceremonies of Ancient Egypt, celebrated to rejuvenate the pharaoh’s strength, vitality, and divine mandate to rule.

Traditionally held in the thirtieth year of a monarch’s reign and repeated at intervals (often every three years thereafter) the festival marked not only longevity but divine favour. More than a royal anniversary, it was a rite of renewal, binding kingship to the eternal rhythms of sacred order”.

 

Whether one can also connect the element of the 30-year festival with the fact that ‘Joseph was 30 years old when he stood before Pharaoh’ is laid out there for further consideration.



 

 

Wednesday, August 19, 2026

Esarhaddon, Cambyses, and the Fall of Egypt’s Memphis capital

 


by

 Damien F. Mackey

  

This catastrophic (for Egypt and the Ramessides) event

has been repeated again and again in the history books.

  

Abridging the ‘Bridge Too Far’ conventional system

 

The fall of the old Egyptian capital of Memphis, now to Esarhaddon (c. 670 BC), now to Ashurbanipal, now (potentially) to Nebuchednezzar, and now to Cambyses (c. 525 BC), is startlingly, in fact, just the one historical event, though spread out by conventional historians over a period of roughly (670-525 =) 150 years.

 

The connecting factor (indeed, there are many of them), from the point of view of Egypt, is the common presence of the Egyptian commander-son of pharaoh Tirhakah (Taharqa), Nes-Anhuret, for Esarhaddon, Usanahuru for Ashurbanipal, and, again, Udjahorresne[t] for Cambyses (and ‘Darius’) – the designated heir and successor of pharaoh Tirhakah and Commander of the Egyptian Fleet.

 

Esarhaddon and Nes-Anhuret, Ashurbanipal and Usanahuru

 

(DOC) Esarhaddon and Nes-Anhuret, Ashurbanipal and Usanahuru

 

He, as Udjahorresne[t], served - but also mentored - Cambyses in Egypt and gave him his royal Egyptian name, Mesuti-Ra:

Udjahorresnet and the Royal Name of Cambyses: The “Derivative Sacrality” of Achaemenids in Egypt - Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections

 

Ivan Ladynin

 

The article deals with a well-known fragment of Udjahorresnet’s autobiography describing his compiling an Egyptian royal titulary for Cambyses after his appearance in Egypt and Udjahorresnet’s elevation at his court. A comparison of Cambyses’ and Darius’ I solar prenomina (Mswty-R and Stwt-R, which can be understood as “the image of Re” and “the likeness of Re”) and an interpretation of the Fayum stela Berlin ÄS 7493 depicting Darius I in the image of the falcon Horus leads one to suspect that the theory finding an excuse to the rule of Achaemenids in Egypt postulated their “deriving” their qualities of sacral ritual rulers from gods incorporated in them. This theory must have been forwarded in Udjahorresnet’s time by his party loyal to the Persian rule.

 

 Cartouche of Cambyses ("Mesuti-Ra Cambyses")

 

Cartouche of Cambyses (“Mesuti-Ra Cambyses”)

Stated differently, Udjahorresne helped Cambyses behave

like a true Egyptian king.

 

Then, typically, the Greeks (Plutarch) got hold of Udjahorresne/Usanahuru and turned him into a Spartan admiral, the famous – though quite fictitious – Lysander:

 

Lysander and Usanhuru

 

(6) Lysander and Usanhuru

 

The radical shortening of the conventional Assyro-Babylonian-Medo-Persian history undertaken here must necessitate a similar condensing of Egyptian dynastic history.

 

That is achieved, in part, by recognising pharaoh Ramses II ‘the Great’ as, all at once, Tirhakah (for Esarhaddon-Ashurbanipal) and Amasis (for Cambyses).

 

See e.g. my article:

 

The Complete Ramses II

 

(6) The Complete Ramses II

 

But there is also an amazing Psammetichus connection, as discussed in my article:

 

Chaldean armies come to Egypt

 

(7) Chaldean armies come to Egypt

 

There I wrote:

 

Psammetichus and other links

 

Psammetichus coincidences

 

We are told that:

 

·       Ashurbanipal invaded Egypt at the time of Psammetichus I (c. 664 BC);

·       Nebuchednezzar invaded Egypt at the time of Psammetichus II (c. 595-589 BC);

·       Cambyses invaded Egypt at the time of Psammetichus III (c. 526-525 BC).

….

 

Memphis taken

 

This catastrophic (for Egypt and the Ramessides) event has been repeated again and again in the history books.

 

Commencing with Esarhaddon, and working our way through to Cambyses, let us take Nebuchednezzar here as our common denominator. 

Esarhaddon, who was Nebuchednezzar in his building of Babylon and in his paranoïc madness, and who failed in his first assault on Egypt and was driven back – just as was the case with Nebuchednezzar:

Esarhaddon | Assyrian King, Neo-Assyrian Empire Ruler | Britannica

“When Egypt inspired a revolt of the Phoenician city of Tyre, Esarhaddon attacked Egypt (675); he had little success until 671, when he seized Memphis and defeated the Egyptian king Taharqa, who fled south, leaving the entire country to Esarhaddon. For the first time a Mesopotamian ruler included “king of Egypt” among his royal titles”. 

 

Likewise, Nebuchednezzar initially had little success with invading Egypt:

Nebuchadnezzar Fails to Conquer Egypt So Jeremiah’s Prophecy Was Updated - TheTorah.com

Nebuchadnezzar attacked Egypt in his fourth regnal year (601/600 B.C.E.). Pharaoh Necho II, in anticipation of this attack, had spent considerable resources massively fortifying the eastern entrances to Egypt at Tell el Qedwa and Tell el-Ghaba on the Pelusiac estuary of the Nile, as well as the gate and fortifications of his capital city, Tanis (biblical Zoan). He thus succeeded in stopping the invasion cold, forcing Nebuchadnezzar’s army to retreat. Even the Babylonian Chronicle—which tends to avoid explicitly mentioning a defeat—has trouble spinning this campaign as a success:

 

In the month Kislev he (Nebuchadnezzar) took his army's lead and marched to Egypt. (When) the king of Egypt heard (the news) he m[ustered] his army. They fought one another in the battlefield and both sides suffered severe losses (lit. they inflicted a major defeat upon one another). The king of Akkad and his army turned and [went back] to Babylon.[7] ….

[End of quote]

 

Esarhaddon, later, brilliantly conquered Memphis:

Esarhaddon and the Limits of Empire: From Memphis to Arabia and the Question of a Southern Campaign - Nineveh News

 

The Conquest of Egypt: A Turning Point in Near Eastern History

Esarhaddon’s Egyptian campaign marks one of the most extraordinary military achievements of the ancient world. After an initial invasion in 673 BC, he reorganized and launched a second campaign in 671 BC, culminating in the capture of Memphis, the heart of Egyptian political power.

 

This victory had several profound implications:

 

  • First Assyrian Conquest of Egypt: No previous Assyrian ruler had successfully subdued Egypt. Esarhaddon accomplished what Tiglath-Pileser III and Sennacherib had not.
  • Defeat of Taharqa: The Kushite pharaoh Taharqa was driven south, and his royal family was captured and deported to Nineveh.
  • Imperial Integration: Esarhaddon reorganized Egypt into a vassal system, installing local rulers such as Necho I under Assyrian oversight.
  • Symbolic Domination: His victory stelae, such as those at Zincirli and Nahr el-Kalb, visually proclaimed Assyria’s supremacy over Egypt, even juxtaposing Assyrian and earlier Egyptian imperial legacies.

[End of quote]

 

Ashurbanipal, who was Nebuchednezzar in his (same) 43-year reign, and having a burning fiery furnace, and in his definitive conquest of Egypt (cf. Jeremiah 43:10-13;  Ezekiel 29:19-20), provides for us the entire account of the conquest of Egypt that we do not have from Nebuchednezzar’s (under that name) records.

 

Ashurbanipal brilliantly conquered Memphis:

Assyrian Army Attacking Memphis - World History Encyclopedia

 

Gypsum panel showing the Assyrian army attacking the Egyptian city of Memphis and commemorating the final victory of the Assyrian king Ashurbanipal II over the Egyptian king Taharqa in 667 BCE. Panel 17, Room M of the North Palace at Nineveh, Northern Mesopotamia, modern-day Iraq, Neo-Assyrian Period, 645-635 BCE.

 

This wall slab was originally painted for the interior walls of Ashurbanipal's palace at Nineveh. At the top, the overwhelming wave of the Assyrian army storms the Egyptian fortress, tries to set fire to the gate, and undermines the walls. The Nubian soldiers, recognizable by the single upright feathers on their heads, are being marched off as prisoners. Egyptian civilian prisoners are shown as a group with two children on a donkey. Below is the River Nile with fish and crabs.

 

Cambyses, who was Nebuchednezzar in his name,

 

Cambyses also named Nebuchadnezzar

 

(8) Cambyses also named Nebuchadnezzar

 

in his madness, and in his definitive conquest of Egypt, famously conquered Memphis:

How to cite this article: Rickard, J (18 February 2015), Siege of Memphis, early 525 BC , https://www.historyofwar.org/articles/siege_memphis_525.html

 

The siege of Memphis (early 525 BC) was the last recorded resistance to Cambyses II of Persia's invasion of Egypt, and came after the main Egyptian army had been defeated at Pelusium.

Early in 525 Cambyses led his army across the Sinai and defeated the armies of Pharaoh Psamtik III at Pelusium. In the aftermath of the battle the Pharaoh retreated to Memphis, and prepared to defend the city.

Cambyses sent a Persian herald on a Mytilenean ship up the Nile to Memphis to suggest a truce. The defenders of Memphis reacted by attacking the ship, killing the crew and bringing the smashed remains of the ship into the city.

Cambyses reacted by laying siege to Memphis. Herodotus doesn’t say how long the siege lasted, but implies that it was long enough for the Libyans and the Greeks of Cyrene to sent tribute to him.

Eventually the city fell and Psamtik III was captured. Herodotus records a story about Cambyses's attempts to humiliate the former Pharaoh by forcing his daughter to carry out menial tasks and killing his son. As is typical in this sort of story Psamtik impressed Cambyses with his responses, and was taken into honourable captivity instead of being executed. He committed suicide a few years later, after being caught in a plot against the Persians.

Cambyses established a new 27th Dynasty, and appears to have been accepted in Egypt. Herodotus claimed that he was an unpopular ruler, but contemporary Egyptian records suggest otherwise. He remained in Egypt for most of the rest of his reign, only setting off for home when a revolt broke out in the heart of the Persian Empire.