Sunday, May 10, 2026

Advantages if Hezekiah’s son Manasseh is identified with Josiah’s son Jehoiakim

 



by

 Damien F. Mackey

 

 It explains the complete absence of the name “Jehoiakim”

in Matthew 1’s Genealogy of Jesus the Messiah.

“Manasseh”, on the other hand, appears there in 1:10.

  

These are my most recent articles in favour of what I now consider to be a:

 

Necessary fusion of Hezekiah and Josiah

 

(7) Necessary fusion of Hezekiah and Josiah

 

Striking a match for Shebna (Sobna) in Hezekiah-Josiah parallel universe

 

(7) Striking a match for Shebna (Sobna) in Hezekiah-Josiah parallel universe

 

One important corollary of this parallelism is that Hezekiah’s idolatrous son, Manasseh, now becomes Josiah’s idolatrous son, Jehoiakim:

 

Manasseh – Jehoiakim

 

(8) Manasseh - Jehoiakim

 

The following two texts, I submit, are describing the very same incident.

 

Manasseh

2 Chronicles 33:11: “Yahweh then brought down on them the generals of the king of Assyria's army who captured Manasseh with hooks, put him in chains and took him to Babylon”.

 

Jehoiakim

2 Chronicles 36-5-6: “Jehoiakim … did what is displeasing to Yahweh his God. Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon attacked him, loaded him with chains and took him to Babylon”.

 

Note the common points: Yahweh; attack by a mighty foe; king of Judah defeated; that king loaded with chains; and taken off to Babylon.

 

Now, in my article:

De-coding Jonah

 

(6) De-coding Jonah | Damien Mackey - Academia.edu

 

I had identified Esarhaddon-Ashurbanipal as Nebuchednezzar.

 

The note in The Jerusalem Bible (33 b, 2 Chr 34) follows the conventional view that Esarhaddon, Ashurbanipal, were separate kings: “Manasseh of Judah was a vassal of Esarhaddon (680-669) and of Assurbanipal (668-633)”.

 

Esarhaddon-Ashurbanipal was just the one king, who only once captured Manasseh of Judah.

 

A few advantages of Manasseh = Jehoiakim

 

Some immediate advantages of this equation are that:

 

-         It explains the complete absence of the name “Jehoiakim” in Matthew 1’s Genealogy of Jesus the Messiah. “Manasseh”, on the other hand, appears there in 1:10;

-         It explains why the prophet Jeremiah would attribute the Babylonian captivity to the supposedly long dead “Manasseh”, when Jeremiah’s wicked contemporary was Jehoiakim (Jeremiah 15:4): “And I will cause them to be removed into all kingdoms of the earth, because of Manasseh the son of Hezekiah king of Judah, for that which he did in Jerusalem”;

-         It may supply that supposedly missing biblical evidence for the martyrdom of the prophet Isaiah, traditionally at the hands of King Manasseh.

 

See my explanation of this in e.g. my article:

 

God can raise up prophets at will - even from a shepherd of Simeon

 

(14) God can raise up prophets at will - even from a shepherd of Simeon